Logo image
Why ethics, relationality and meaning-making matter to resilience education: Initiatives from global disaster contexts
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Why ethics, relationality and meaning-making matter to resilience education: Initiatives from global disaster contexts

Belinda Jane Davis, Alan Reid and Ilan Kelman
Review of education, Vol.14(2), pp.1-28
08/2026
pdf
Why ethics, relationality and meaning-making matter to resilience education534.94 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
Why ethics, relationality and meaning-making matter to resilience educationView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Related links

Metrics

1 Record Views

Abstract

disaster contexts education for resilience relationality socialisation
Education is widely positioned in international policy frameworks as a mechanism for fostering agency in young people to promote resilience in their communities, including in the United Nation's Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction. However, educational responses to disaster risk, emanating from natural hazards, frequently emphasise technical preparedness over attention to the socially contextualised and ethical dimensions of education. Drawing on Gert Biesta's distinctions between three core functions of education (qualification, socialisation and subjectification), and Paul Ricoeur's understanding of relational identity as ‘Oneself as Another’, we propose novel socialised forms of education that foster meaningful resilience. Data were obtained through deliberative discussions with disaster education programme implementers and education scholars in Japan, Indonesia and the United States and analysed through interpretive phenomenological analysis. Three core themes are identified as framing a socialised form of resilience education: (1) orienting education towards communal experiences of disaster, (2) fostering a critical consciousness grounded in empathy and (3) honouring culturally situated interpretations of disaster. Our findings show that socialised approaches to education offer unique insights into how concepts of risk, resilience and agency are interpreted across social and cultural contexts. We argue that attending to these socialised conceptualisations enable a higher quality of resilience education: promoting ethically grounded, culturally responsive and socially situated forms of agency more akin to a ‘futures thinking’ approach that also serves to reposition education's core functions beyond standardised ‘technical fixes’.

Details

Logo image