Logo image
Simulation studies comparing fixed effect and mixed models in data sets with multiple measurements in individual sampling units
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Simulation studies comparing fixed effect and mixed models in data sets with multiple measurements in individual sampling units

P. W West and D. A Ratkowsky
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Vol.92(1), pp.81-100
2022
url
Simulation studies comparing fixed effect and mixed models in data sets with multiple measurements in individual sampling unitsView
Published (Version of record)

Related links

Metrics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Abstract

Regression mixed models multiple measurements fixed effects longitudinal data
Use of mixed models is advocated almost ubiquitously when regression analysis is applied in data sets that contain multiple measurements in individual sampling units that lead to intercorrelation amongst the residuals. Using two examples, simulation studies were undertaken comparing models that contained fixed effects only with mixed models in which random effects identified the sampling units within the data set. Both approaches resulted in unbiased estimates of the parameters. The choice of a suitable parameterization for the mixed model proved difficult. It was found that use of either an appropriate mixed model or a lesser-known method ('adjusted ordinary least squares regression') to fit models with fixed effects only could yield unbiased estimates of the standard errors of the parameter estimates. However, difficulties remain with computational methods in both cases and it cannot be assumed, a priori, that either approach is necessarily superior to the other for any particular data set.

Details

Logo image