Logo image
Back
Characteristics of global naturopathic education, regulation, and practice frameworks: results from an international survey
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Characteristics of global naturopathic education, regulation, and practice frameworks: results from an international survey

J M Dunn, A E Steel, J Adams, I Lloyd, N De Groot, T Hausser and J Wardle
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, Vol.21(1), pp.67-67
18/02/2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03217-1
PMID: 33602181
pdf
Characteristics of global naturopathic education487.39 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0,  Open Access
url
Characteristics of global naturopathic education, regulation, and practice frameworks: results from an international surveyView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

80 File views/ downloads
49 Record Views
16 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

Cross-Sectional Studies Global Health Attitude Humans Professional Practice Education, Professional Social Control, Formal Integrative Medicine Delivery of Health Care Organizations Surveys and Questionnaires Accreditation Naturopathy Naturopathy
This descriptive study provides the first examination of global naturopathic education, regulation and practice frameworks that have potential to constrain or assist professional formation and integration in global health systems. Despite increasing public use, a significant workforce, and World Health Organization calls for national policy development to support integration of services, existent frameworks as potential barriers to integration have not been examined. This cross-sectional survey utilized purposive sampling of 65 naturopathic organisations (educational institutions, professional associations, and regulatory bodies) from 29 countries. Organizational representatives completed an on-line survey, conducted between Nov 2016 - Aug 2019. Frequencies and cross-tabulation statistics were analyzed using SPSSv.25. Qualitative responses were hand-coded and thematically analysed where appropriate. Sixty-five of 228 naturopathic organizations completed the survey (29% response rate) from 29 of 46 countries (63% country response rate). Most education programs (68%) were delivered via a national framework. Higher education qualifications (60%) predominated. Organizations influential in education were professional associations (75.4%), particularly where naturopathy was unregulated, and accreditation bodies (41.5%) and regulatory boards (33.8%) where regulated. Full access to controlled acts, and to health insurance rebates were more commonly reported where regulated. Attitude of decision-makers, opinions of other health professions and existing legislation were perceived to most impact regulation, which was globally heterogeneous. Education and regulation of the naturopathic profession has significant heterogeneity, even in the face of global calls for consistent regulation that recognizes naturopathy as a medical system. Standards are highest and consistency more apparent in countries with regulatory frameworks.

Details

Logo image