Logo image
World delirium awareness and quality survey in 2023-a worldwide point prevalence study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

World delirium awareness and quality survey in 2023-a worldwide point prevalence study

 Heidi Lindroth,  Keibun Liu,  Laura Szalacha,  Shelly Ashkenazy,  Giuseppe Bellelli,  Mark Van Den Boogaard,  Gideon Caplan,  Chi Ryang Chung,  Muhammed Elhadi,  Mohan Gurjar, …
Age and ageing, Vol.53(11), pp.1-11
20/11/2024
PMID: 39568389
pdf
World delirium awareness and quality survey in 2023580.16 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
World delirium awareness and quality survey in 2023View
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Related links

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

global delirium prevalence standard of practice delivery of health care cross-sectional studies older people
Background: Delirium, an acute brain dysfunction, is proposed to be highly prevalent in clinical care and shown to significantly increase the risk of mortality and dementia. Objectives: To report on the global prevalence of clinically documented delirium and delirium-related clinical practices in wards caring for paediatric and adult patients in healthcare facilities. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional, 39-question survey completed on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Participants: Clinicians or researchers with access to clinical data. Main outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was the prevalence of clinically documented delirium at 8:00 a.m. (4 h) and 8:00 p.m. (±4 h). Secondary outcomes included delirium-related care practices and barriers to use. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multilevel modelling was completed. Results: 1664 wards submitted surveys from 44 countries, reporting on delirium assessments at 8:00 a.m. (n = 36 048) and 8:00 p.m. (n = 32 867); 61% reported use of validated delirium assessment tools. At 8:00 a.m., 18% (n = 2788/15 458) and at 8:00 p.m., 17.7% (n = 2454/13 860) were delirium positive. Top prevention measures were pain management (86.7%), mobilisation (81.4%) and adequate fluids (80.4%). Frequently reported pharmacologic interventions were benzodiazepines (52.7%) and haloperidol (46.2%). Top barriers included the shortage of staff (54.3%), lack of time to educate staff (48.6%) and missing knowledge about delirium (38%). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, approximately one out of five patients were reported as delirious. The reported high use of benzodiazepines needs further evaluation as it is not aligned with best-practice recommendations. Findings provide a benchmark for future quality improvement projects and research.

Details

Logo image