Logo image
Women pregnant after previous perinatal loss: relationships between adult attachment, shame, and prenatal psychological outcomes
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Women pregnant after previous perinatal loss: relationships between adult attachment, shame, and prenatal psychological outcomes

Julia Marysia Caldwell, Pamela J. Meredith, Koa Whittingham, Jenny Ziviani and Trish Wilson
Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, Vol.42(4), pp.653-667
2024
PMID: 36800926
pdf
Women pregnant after previous perinatal loss: relationships between adult attachment, shame, and prenatal psychological outcomes855.60 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Women pregnant after previous perinatal loss: relationships between adult attachment, shame, and prenatal psychological outcomesView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
18 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Abstract

perinatal grief pregnancy after loss self-blame Shame social connectedness
Background Insecure adult attachment, shame, self-blame, and isolation following perinatal loss place bereaved women at risk of adverse psychological outcomes, which can impact child and family outcomes. To date, no research has considered how these variables continue to influence women’s psychological health in pregnancy subsequent to loss. Objective This study explored associations between prenatal psychological adjustment (less grief and distress) and adult attachment, shame, and social connectedness, in women pregnant after loss. Method Twenty-nine pregnant Australian women accessing a Pregnancy After Loss Clinic (PALC) completed measures of attachment styles, shame, self-blame, social connectedness, perinatal grief, and psychological distress. Results Four 2-step hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed adult attachment (secure/avoidant/anxious; Step 1), shame, self-blame, and social connectedness (Step 2) explained 74% difficulty coping, 74% total grief, 65% despair, and 57% active grief. Avoidant attachment predicted more difficulty coping and higher levels of despair. Self-blame predicted more active grief, difficulty coping, and despair. Social connectedness predicted lower active grief, and significantly mediated relationships between perinatal grief and all three attachment patterns (secure/avoidant/anxious). Conclusions Although avoidant attachment and self-blame can heighten grief in pregnancy after loss, focusing on social connectedness may be a helpful way for prenatal clinicians to support pregnant women during their subsequent pregnancy – and in grief.

Details

Logo image