Logo image
Back
Why shouldn't teacher education produce 'ready-to-teach' graduates? Mapping a pathway to alternative teacher education and teacher becomings
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Why shouldn't teacher education produce 'ready-to-teach' graduates? Mapping a pathway to alternative teacher education and teacher becomings

Olivera Kamenarac
Higher education research and development, Vol.44(2), pp.431-445
17/02/2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2399068
Appears in  Recent Faculty of Education Publications
pdf
Why shouldn't teacher education produce 'ready-to-teach' graduates? Mapping a pathway to alternative teacher education and teacher becomings799.18 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC V4.0,  Open Access
url
Why shouldn't teacher education produce 'ready-to-teach' graduates?View
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

4 File views/ downloads
40 Record Views
1 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Abstract

teacher education readiness to teach the teacher subject and subjectivity critical posthumanism
Teacher education reforms worldwide have reinforced a narrative that 'high-quality' teaching and teachers are the most significant contributors to raising education achievement, reducing societal inequities, and boosting economic development. Consequently, countries have put substantial efforts into regulating initial teacher education (ITE) to ensure graduates are 'ready' to deliver 'high-quality' practice tackling education and societal issues. This paper problematises the widespread narrative of ITE by critiquing the construction of 'ready to teach' graduates in a leading New Zealand ITE regulatory policy. I argue that teaching and assessing 'readiness' via ITE has reinforced 'linearity' and 'technical rationalism' in defining what it is to be a teacher. It has also reflected humanist-colonial discourses that placed solely human agency, capacity, and achievement at the centre of global progress. I propose making a qualitative shift in conceptualising ITE and moving away from defining 'quality' and 'achievement' through a set of 'special properties essential to the human knowing subject'. Recognising that the knowing subject is never the teacher alone, but is a living constellation of human, nonhuman, and more-than-human elements with distributed agency is vital for inviting alternative teacher becomings that societies need to change the status quo.

Details

Logo image