Logo image
Wear and tribocorrosion of AISI 52100 steel in wind turbine blade bearings
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Wear and tribocorrosion of AISI 52100 steel in wind turbine blade bearings

Mahdi Jalilvand, Mohsen Feyzi, Reza Hashemi, Khosro Fallahnezhad and Amir Zanj
Tribology international, Vol.226, pp.1-20
02/2027
pdf
Wear and tribocorrosion of AISI 52100 steel in wind turbine blade bearings21.55 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0
url
Wear and tribocorrosion of AISI 52100 steel in wind turbine blade bearingsView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads
1 Record Views

Abstract

Bearing Steel Blade Bearings Tribocorrosion Wear Wind Turbines
Seawater ingress into offshore wind turbine blade bearings can promote tribocorrosion, leading to accelerated degradation and reduced component reliability. To better understand this damage mechanism, the wear and tribocorrosion behaviour of AISI 52100 bearing steel was investigated in dry and seawater mimicking conditions at three sliding velocities representative of wind turbine blade bearing operating conditions. Electrochemical characterisations, including open circuit potential, potentiodynamic polarisation, and potentiostatic measurements, were further employed to elucidate the tribocorrosion mechanisms and quantify the individual contributions of wear, corrosion, and their synergistic interactions to the overall material loss. Results in the dry environment showed that increasing the sliding ratio, defined as the ratio of oscillation amplitude to the Hertzian contact width, led to a significant rise in wear rate, whereas in a seawater environment, this increase was less pronounced. Confocal and scanning electron microscopy revealed that mild abrasion was the dominant wear mechanism under dry conditions, while in the seawater environment, corrosion augmented the abrasion. In addition to a wear scar, the tribocorrosion damage produced distinct surface features, such as differentially corroded and unaffected zones. Overall, the findings demonstrated that corrosion-assisted wear and pure mechanical wear accounted for respectively ~61% and ~28% of the material loss while wear-assisted corrosion and pure corrosion contributed only approximately~10% and ~1%, respectively, of the material loss.

Details

Logo image