This article presents a methodology for quantifying the costs of dysfunctional environmental regulation faced by the Australian rail industry and derives indicative lessons for best practice with respect to measuring regulatory burden. By drawing on results from a recent benchmarking analysis, the suitability of the methodology is assessed. The study suggests that the methodology presented could be applied to other industries seeking to measure the policy-inefficient government regulatory burden. Further methodological improvements are also recommended.
Journal article
Towards best practice in measuring regulatory burdens: a case study of environmental regulation in the Australian Rail industry
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.13(4), pp.385-410
2012
Metrics
19 Record Views
Abstract
Details
- Title
- Towards best practice in measuring regulatory burdens: a case study of environmental regulation in the Australian Rail industry
- Creators
- Jianxiong Wang - Southern Cross UniversityTania von der Heidt - Southern Cross UniversityMichael Charles - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol.13(4), pp.385-410
- Identifiers
- 1389; 991012820417102368
- Academic Unit
- School of Business and Tourism; Faculty of Business, Law and Arts; Management
- Resource Type
- Journal article