Journal article
The tragedy of climate change science
Climate and development, Vol.14(9), pp.829-833
21/10/2022
Metrics
1 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs from InCites
Abstract
The science-society contract is broken. The climate is changing. Science demonstrates why this is occurring, that it is getting worse, the implications for human well-being and social-ecological systems, and substantiates action. Governments agree that the science is settled. The tragedy of climate change science is that at the same time as compelling evidence is gathered, fresh warnings issued, and novel methodologies developed, indicators of adverse global change rise year upon year. Meanwhile, global responses to Covid-19 have shown that even emergent scientific knowledge can bolster radical government action. We explore three options for the climate change science community. We find that two options are untenable and one is unpalatable. Given the urgency and criticality of climate change, we argue the time has come for scientists to agree to a moratorium on climate change research as a means to first expose, then renegotiate, the broken science-society contract.
Details
- Title
- The tragedy of climate change science
- Creators
- Bruce C. Glavovic - Massey UniversityTimothy F. Smith - University of the Sunshine CoastIain White - University of Waikato
- Publication Details
- Climate and development, Vol.14(9), pp.829-833
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Number of pages
- 5
- Identifiers
- 991013386629302368
- Copyright
- © 2021 The Author(s).
- Academic Unit
- Office of Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article