This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Competitive athletes goal-setting theory non-specific goals quantitative synthesis self-regulation theory
Goal setting is widely applied in sport. Whereas existing reviews have addressed the performance effects of goal setting, less is known about the concurrent psychological and psychophysiological effects. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that synthesised the effects of goal setting on task performance and various psychological and psychophysiological outcomes in sport. Searches returned 17,841 articles, with 27 meeting eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis of the performance effects and a narrative synthesis of the psychological and psychophysiological effects were undertaken. Process goals had the largest effect on performance (d = 1.36) compared to performance goals (d = 0.44) and outcome goals (d = 0.09). No significant difference in performance was found between specific (d = 0.37) and non-specific goals (d = 0.72). Process goals also had large effects on self-efficacy (d = 1.11), whereas studies guided by self-regulation theory (k = 5) produced the greatest performance enhancements (d = 1.53). It was rarely possible to draw conclusions regarding the effects of goal setting on psychological/psychophysiological outcomes due to a lack of cross study evidence. Nevertheless, these findings provide important insights to guide research and practice on the use of goal setting to enhance performance and psychological/psychophysiological outcomes in sport.
Details
Title
The performance and psychological effects of goal setting in sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Creators
Ollie Williamson - University of Lincoln
Christian Swann - Southern Cross University
Kyle J.M. Bennett - Southern Cross University
Matthew D. Bird - University of Lincoln
Scott G. Goddard - Southern Cross University
Matthew J. Schweickle - University of Wollongong
Patricia C. Jackman - University of Lincoln
Publication Details
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol.17(2), pp.1050-1078
Publisher
Routledge
Number of pages
29
Grant note
This work was supported by Southern Cross University and the University of Lincoln: [Grant Number 125001 2801].