Australia’s economic development has historically been closely tied to the extractive industries sector. Currently, opportunities abound for Aboriginalpeoples to engage with, and potentially benefit from engagement with a variety of extractive industries. Using a case study of Coal Seam Gas (CSG) development in the State of New South Wales, this paper focusses upon the discursive constraints that can marginalise Indigenous agency in the complex milieu presented by CSG development. It argues that discursive framings can, and do, contribute to an ideological setting that may constrain attempts by Aboriginal people who seek to participate in the opportunities presented by extractive industries, particularly those extractive industries that are deemed environmentally risky or damaging. Employing the Strategic Relational Approach (SRA), it contends that discursive framings are not merely ideological tools that socially construct reality, but via the dialectic relationship between discursivity and materiality, they can have substantial material consequences for Aboriginal people.
Journal article
The friction of fracking: discursive constraints on Aboriginal participation in coal seam gas in Northern NSW
The Extractive Industries and Society, Vol.4(2), pp.329-336
2017
Metrics
51 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- The friction of fracking: discursive constraints on Aboriginal participation in coal seam gas in Northern NSW
- Creators
- Catherine Howlett - Griffith UniversityLana Dee Hartwig - Griffith University
- Publication Details
- The Extractive Industries and Society, Vol.4(2), pp.329-336
- Identifiers
- 1122; 991012820914602368
- Academic Unit
- Gnibi College of Indigenous Australian Peoples
- Resource Type
- Journal article