Logo image
Back
The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant-vs Meat-Predominant Dietary Patterns and Depression: An Umbrella Review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant-vs Meat-Predominant Dietary Patterns and Depression: An Umbrella Review

Megan F Lee, Jessica Bayes, Ahmed A. Moustafa, Maximilian A. Storz and Talitha Best
Nutrition Reviews, Vol.84(4), pp.798-811
04/2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf073
Appears in  Recent Faculty of Education Publications
pdf
The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant- vs Meat-Predominant Dietary Patterns and Depression1.37 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant- vs Meat-Predominant Dietary PatternsView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Related links

Metrics

20 Record Views
4 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#12 Responsible Consumption & Production
#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: SDGs from InCites

Abstract

vegan vegetarian plant-based omnivore depressive symptoms
Context: Diets rich in plant foods are associated with reduced risk of depressive symptoms. However, previous studies have reported greater depressive symptomology in patients who follow a plant-predominant dietary pattern. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of associations of plant-and meat-predominant diets and depression have highlighted conflicting results. Objectives: In this umbrella review we applied A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) to explore the state of evidence regarding possible associations of plant-and meat-predominant dietary patterns with depression. Data Sources: Six databases were searched from the date of inception to January 2025: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent researchers using Covidence software. Data Analysis: The search revealed 104 studies, of which 9 met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized and narratively grouped by plant-predominant and meat-predominant dietary patterns. Conclusions: Five articles reported associations between plant-and meat-predominant dietary patterns and depression, 4 reported that plant-predominant dietary patterns increased depression, and 5 found conflicting or no associations. Similar systematic search terms, overlap of primary studies, and short timeframes between reviews raise concerns about the validity and scientific contribution of repeated systematic review of this topic. To address these concerns, we highlight the need for greater awareness of methodological issues, including high reliance on observational studies, high levels of heterogeneity, imprecision of measurement tools, and lack of measurement of dietary adherence and composition.

Details

Logo image