Logo image
Back
Student evaluations: pedagogical tools, or weapons of choice?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Student evaluations: pedagogical tools, or weapons of choice?

John Orr, Warwick Fisher, John Page, Alessandro Pelizzon and Helen Walsh
Legal Education review, Vol.30(1), pp.1-28
17/08/2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.14561
pdf
Student evaluations: pedagogical tools, or weapons of choice?430.82 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open Access
url
Student evaluations: Pedagogical tools, or weapons of choice?View
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

15 File views/ downloads
105 Record Views
2 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Abstract

Regional law school Teaching satisfaction Unit feedback Student evaluations
In this paper, we survey the recent literature of student evaluation surveys (‘SETs’) in the university sector, in so doing identifying a number of diverse issues that this literature reveals, and contextualising its general findings to the teaching practices of a regional Australian law school. This article argues that, contrary to their original intention, SETs are more often used as blunt instruments than nuanced pedagogical tools. Case studies drawn from Southern Cross University’s School of Law and Justice (SLJ) corroborate the general tenor of the literature, namely that there is ‘little evidence that study findings are being used to change or improve the student learning experience.’ Rather, these increasingly streamlined surveys provide online opportunities to take the subjective ‘pulse’ of student satisfaction, momentary snapshots that often generate instant heat, but shed little light. We argue that SETs need to be seen in context, as part of a wider and more pedagogically informed measure of good teaching. While it seems unlikely that SETs in their present form will disappear overnight, their continuing validity requires current teaching evaluation to be itself evaluated, the first priority being the paring back of survey questions to only those factors capable of objective and verifiable measurement.

Details

Logo image