Logo image
Response of a koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) source population following a large-scale progressive translocation harvest
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Response of a koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) source population following a large-scale progressive translocation harvest

John Callaghan, Stephen Phillips and Ross Goldingay
Pacific conservation biology, Vol.31(3), pp.1-15
27/05/2025
pdf
Response of a koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) source population4.42 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
Response of a koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) source populationView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

5 File views/ downloads
24 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Abstract

conservation translocation correlated replicate surveys habitat loss habitat occupancy mitigation translocation monitoring population response source population
Context: Translocation is an important tool for species conservation. However, comparatively few translocation programs have investigated the impacts on source populations. The distribution and size of a koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population occupying a rapidly urbanising landscape in south-east Queensland, Australia were investigated before and after progressive removal of koalas. Aims: This study investigated how the population responded following translocation of 166 koalas over a 5-year period concomitant with loss of habitat. Methods: Baseline surveys conducted in 2006 were compared to post-translocation surveys of the same area in 2017. Survey sites were located on a grid positioned over the study area. Sites were sampled using scat surveys to measure koala activity and fixed-radius searches for koalas to estimate population density. Key results: The koala population size estimated in 2017 (440 ± 66 s.e.) was not markedly different to that for 2006 (510 ± 67 s.e.), with koalas occupying remaining habitat at similar density. The analysis did not identify any significant change in occupancy between survey periods. Estimates of the probability of detection were high in both periods with the preferred tree species group having values >0.8. Naïve occupancy estimates from raw field data were consistent with that predicted by modelling. Conclusions: The results suggest that relatively large source populations of koalas can cope with a progressive translocation harvest. Implications The population coped better than anticipated. Regardless, monitoring is important as the new town centre is completed. Further management actions may be necessary to support and sustain the remaining population.

Details

Logo image