Journal article
Re Imogen: the role of the Family Court of Australia in disputes over gender dysphoria treatment
Monash bioethics review, Vol.39, pp.42-66
12/2021
PMID: 34537934
Metrics
14 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
This article examines Re Imogen (No 6) (2020) 61 Fam LR 344, a decision of the Family Court of Australia, which held that an application to the Family Court is mandatory if a parent or a medical practitioner of a child or adolescent diagnosed with gender dysphoria disputes the diagnosis, the capacity to consent, or the proposed treatment. First, we explain the regulatory framework for the medical treatment of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents, including the development of the welfare jurisdiction under Section 67ZC of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). We then provide an overview of the Re Imogen decision, and discuss the balancing exercise involved in determining a child's best interests in the medical treatment context. We challenge the Family Court's conclusion that, in relation to a dispute about diagnosis or treatment, a finding that the child or adolescent is Gillick competent to consent to treatment is not determinative, and the Family Court must determine the dispute. We argue that this conclusion represents an unjustified incursion into the right of Gillick competent transgender children and adolescents to make decisions about their own bodies and identities, and that the protective role of parents and the Family Court cannot justify interfering with their bodily autonomy in this context. Finally, we propose an alternative regulatory framework that removes the Family Court from the medical treatment process for gender dysphoria in circumstances of dispute between a parent and their Gillick competent child.
Details
- Title
- Re Imogen: the role of the Family Court of Australia in disputes over gender dysphoria treatment
- Creators
- Georgina Dimopoulos - Swinburne University of TechnologyMichelle Taylor-Sands - Melbourne Business School
- Publication Details
- Monash bioethics review, Vol.39, pp.42-66
- Publisher
- Springer
- Identifiers
- 991013093612202368
- Copyright
- © Monash University 2021
- Academic Unit
- Faculty of Business, Law and Arts
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article