Logo image
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations

Elise Cogo, Mohamed Elsayed, Vivian Liang, Kieran Cooley, Christilynn Guerin, Athanasios Psihogios and Peter Papadogianis
Current Oncology (Toronto), Vol.28(6), pp.5192-5214
07/12/2021
PMCID: PMC8700227
PMID: 34940074
pdf
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery11.96 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological SurgeryView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

187 File views/ downloads
25 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

naturopath perioperative Bifidobacterium nutritional supplements integrative prebiotics cancer synbiotics microbiome Lactobacillus
Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs’ (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI: 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI: 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias. Conclusions: This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that “probiotics” are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein

Details

Logo image