Logo image
Privacy and hacking powers: Is there an implied right to privacy in the use of computer surveillance powers in Australia?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Privacy and hacking powers: Is there an implied right to privacy in the use of computer surveillance powers in Australia?

Brendan Walker-Munro, Ruby Ioannou and David Mount
Salus journal, Vol.12(1)
08/01/2024
url
Privacy and Hacking Powers: Is there an Implied Right to Privacy in the Use of Computer Surveillance Powers in Australia?View
Published (Version of record)Free to Read Open

Related links

Metrics

27 Record Views

Abstract

Hacking privacy national security law enforcement Commonwealth law Criminal law Criminal procedure Administrative law Criminal justice Law enforcement Law reform
On 3 September 2021, Australia’s Commonwealth Parliament passed the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021 (Cth). In doing so, they added to an already expansive regime of warrants and authorisations, enabling law enforcement and intelligence officers to break into, search, seize and even destroy computers, devices, or networks. These powers are largely untested in terms of judicial appeal and administrative review and are some of the most privacy-intrusive powers given by any legislation anywhere in the world. In examining the scope and interference enabled by these powers, we conclude that officers seeking warrants to hack into or damage computers, devices or networks in Australia have an implicit duty to consider the effect of their actions on the suspect’s privacy.

Details

Logo image