Logo image
Back
Prescribing Practices and Behaviours of Advanced Practice Nurses and Pharmacists: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Prescribing Practices and Behaviours of Advanced Practice Nurses and Pharmacists: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

Andrew Cashin, Brigitte Fong Yeong Woo, Agnes Higgins, Mary Casey, Thomas Buckley and Wentao Zhou
Journal of advanced nursing, Vol.First online, pp.1-14
30/07/2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70111
Appears in  Recent Faculty of Health Publications

Metrics

29 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

advanced practice non medical prescribing nurse practioners nurse prescribing
Aim: To explore the prescribing practices and behaviours of Advanced Practice Nurses (APN) and pharmacist prescribers in Singapore, assess their confidence in key prescribing competencies, examine their use of information sources, and understand their views on the consequences of prescribing errors. Design: Cross-sectional national survey. Methods: A census survey of all registered APN and pharmacist prescribers in Singapore was conducted from February to May2024 using a validated 96-item instrument. The survey assessed prescribing practices, confidence in prescribing competencies, use of information sources, and prescribing safety. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: Ninety-one prescribers (54 APNs, 37 pharmacists) responded (32% response rate), most of whom worked in public medical/surgical settings. Prescribing comprised a median of 75% of their practice. Most time was spent prescribing continued medications, with less on initiating new medicines. Participants reported high confidence in communication, therapeutic partnerships, and working within professional standards. Greatest confidence was seen in educating patients, legal prescribing, and monitoring treatment response. Lower confidence was noted in complementary medicine-related tasks. Professional literature and colleagues were the most valued information sources. Most participants acknowledged the serious consequences of prescribing errors, though many believed such errors would likely be intercepted. Conclusion: APNs and pharmacists demonstrate strong competencies in safe, holistic prescribing. However, cultural factors may limit patient engagement, highlighting the need to strengthen shared decision-making and collaborative practice. Implications for the Profession: Refining governance structures, adopting tiered prescriber autonomy, and enhancing training in complex prescribing are essential. Standardising deprescribing, improving access to decision-support tools, and promoting interprofessional collaboration and patient involvement can strengthen care quality and team-based delivery. Impact: This study offers the first national insight into Singapore's Collaborative Prescribing Framework and informs training, policy, and workforce development for non-physician prescribers locally and in similar international contexts. Reporting Method: STROBE checklist. Patient or Public Contribution: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Details

Logo image