Following upon A.I., Minority Report is another Steven Spielberg foray into filmic futurism, and bears all of his (largely) malign influences: the over produced mise-en-scene of Washington in 2080, the lame script of one liners (“Everybody runs!!!”) and, of course, the execrable Tom Cruise. Nonetheless, this third cinematic outing for a Philip K.Dick novella is of particular interests to lawyers - and especially jurisprudes - more so than 90s Arnie vehicle Total Recall (based on I Can Dream For You Wholesale) and Ridley Scott’s 80s masterpiece Bladerunner (based on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?). This is because Dick’s interest in sight, in dream-vision, in the unconscious is yoked in Minority Report to an aspiration that has haunted legal thought, especially American Realism, for the last century: namely, a how to develop a fool-proof 'predictive theory of law'. Minority Report differs, however, from American Realism to this extent: while Realists, like Oliver Wendell Holmes, wanted to be able to predict the outcome of court decisions in their (mis)application of the rules, Dick (and Spielberg) want to circumvent the courts altogether, in order to predict, and nip in the bud the facts of crime, thereby rendering any recourse to the rules supernumerary. So Realism wants to align rules with results; Minority Report wants results without rules. All of which suggests that Minority Report may be articulating a kind of counter-jurisprudence, even anti-jurisprudence which writes the law - its rules, its processes, and institutional systems - out of the picture altogether. This anti-jurisprudence is, however, an intensely jurisprudential move, and one that has been well underway in one of the key movements in legal theory over the last thirty years: namely, Law and Economics. This article will argue that Law and Economics and Minority Report are animated by the same jurisprudence of anti-jurisprudence, but with this difference; that is, the film mounts a trenchant critique of the movement in characters, plot-lines and scenarios which graphically dramatise, amongst other things, rational choice, utility, the Coase theorem and the exchangeability of all commodities, including subjects as much as objects. In so doing, Minority Report calls to account the dilemma Law and Economics finds itself mired in: that it knows the price of everything, and the value of nothing.