Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey

Jeremy Y. Ng; Stephanie Y. Li; Holger Cramer

doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03661-9

Back

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey

Jeremy Y. Ng, Stephanie Y. Li and Holger Cramer

BMC neurology, Vol.24, 215

24/06/2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03661-9

Appears in Recent National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine Publications

Files and links (2)

pdf

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey2.03 MBDownload View

Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0, Open Access

url

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional surveyView

Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0, Open

Metrics

7 Record Views

See more details

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine

Integrative medicine

Neurology

Mind-body therapies

Conventional medicine

Barriers

Perceptions and attitudes

Background While many patients with neurological disorders and conditions use complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM), little is known about the use, perceptions, and attitudes regarding CAIM among published neurology authors. With the increasing popularity of CAIM, our objective was to assess practices, perceptions, and attitudes towards CAIM among published neurology authors. Methods We conducted an anonymous online survey of authors who had published articles in neurology journals indexed in MEDLINE. We emailed potential participants our cross-sectional electronic survey after extracting their email addresses from one of their publications in our sample of journals. Basic descriptive statistics were drawn from quantitative data, and thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data from any open-ended questions. Results The survey was completed by 783 published neurology authors (1.7% response rate, 83.9% completion rate). Overall, respondents perceived CAIM to be promising in preventing, treating, and/or managing neurological diseases. Mind-body therapies received the most positive responses, indicated by over half of respondents cumulatively agreeing that they are promising (n = 368, 59.0%) and safe (n = 280, 50.3%). Whole medical systems and biofield therapy were less favourable. Most neurology clinicians reported a lack of formal (n = 211, 70.3%) and supplementary training (n = 158, 52.5%) on CAIM. Nearly half of clinicians did not feel comfortable counselling patients about CAIM therapies (n = 121, 44.5%), and over half did not feel comfortable recommending them (n = 161, 59.3%). A lack of scientific evidence for CAIM’s safety and efficacy was reported as the greatest challenge to CAIM (n = 515, 92.5%). The majority of respondents believed there is value to conducting research on this topic (n = 461, 82.0%) and supported increasing allocation of research funding towards CAIM (n = 241, 58.9%). Conclusions Although many participants found CAIM to be promising to the field of neurology, the vast majority did not feel open to integrating CAIM into mainstream medical practices on account of a perceived lack of scientific evidence for its safety and efficacy. Future studies can use our findings to gather more detailed insights, improve educational resources on CAIM within neurology, as well as examine what effects a tailored CAIM education has on the perceptions and attitudes of published neurology authors towards CAIM.

Details

Title: Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey
Creators: Jeremy Y. Ng - University Hospital Tübingen (Tübingen, Germany)
Stephanie Y. Li - University Hospital Tübingen (Tübingen, Germany)
Holger Cramer - University Hospital Tübingen (Tübingen, Germany)
Publication Details: BMC neurology, Vol.24, 215
Publisher: BioMed Central
Identifiers: 991013204712502368
Academic Unit: National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey

Files and links (2)

Metrics

Abstract

Details

Southern Cross University Social media