Logo image
Back
Patients' experiences and reasons for unplanned return visits to the emergency department: A qualitative study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Patients' experiences and reasons for unplanned return visits to the emergency department: A qualitative study

Claire Hutchinson, Kate Curtis and Andrea McCloughen
Journal of advanced nursing, Vol.79(7), pp.2597-2609
07/2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15617
PMID: 36908057
pdf
Patients' experiences and reasons for unplanned return visits to the emergency department: A qualitative study472.68 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open Access
url
Patients' experiences and reasons for unplanned return visits to the emergency department: A qualitative studyView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

57 File views/ downloads
72 Record Views
8 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nursing Science & Technology emergency service discharge patient experience patient satisfaction qualitative research readmission return visit revisit trust
Aims The aim of this study was to explore the reasons for and experiences of patients who make an unplanned return visit to the emergency department. Design This study forms the qualitative phase of a larger explanatory sequential mixed methods study and is informed by interpretive description. The paper was prepared using the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Methods Semi-structured patient interviews were conducted over a 3-month period (July–September 2021). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Interviews from 13 participants generated findings related to experiences at and following their initial visit that contributed to their decision to return to the emergency department. Four themes were developed: (1) Patients experience barriers to feeling heard and having their concerns addressed; (2) Patients have little choice but to place their trust in clinicians; (3) Patients unexpectedly experience persistent symptoms which cannot be managed at home; and (4) Patients develop a sense of urgency about having their condition treated. Conclusion A negative experience at the initial ED visit may have dual conflicting impacts. It can contribute to patients' perceived need for a return visit because they are ill-equipped to manage their condition at home, and it can also contribute to their initial reluctance to return to the ED when symptoms persist. Nurses and other clinicians working in ED need to actively build patient's experiential trust through clear communication, timely consultation and shared decision-making at discharge, which in turn can increase patient's confidence and capability to self-manage their condition. This study adds to the current body of literature about return visits by highlighting that a more positive experience of ED may assist patients to make better-informed decisions about when and how to seek treatment and minimize unnecessary and unplanned return visits. Whilst not an intended topic for exploration in this study, the COVID-19 pandemic influenced patients' experiences at both initial and return ED visits and limited their ability to access primary healthcare options. These experiences contributed to patients' decisions to make a return visit.

Details

Logo image