Undertaking a systematic review can have many benefits, beyond any theoretical or conceptual discoveries pertaining to the underlying research question. This paper explores the value of utilising a hybrid academic team when undertaking the systematic review process, and shares a range of practical strategies. The paper also comments on how such a hybrid team sits in a continuum of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Key recommendations include choosing a great team, communicating well, documenting everything, and being explicit – for the benefit of your research team, and the readers of your systematic review.
Journal article
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic terms: lessons from a systematic review process
Australian Universities' Review, Vol.60(1), pp.16-24
2018
Metrics
56 Record Views
Abstract
Details
- Title
- Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic terms: lessons from a systematic review process
- Creators
- Warren William Lake - Southern Cross UniversityMargie Wallin - Southern Cross UniversityBill E Boyd - Southern Cross UniversityGeoff Woolcott - Southern Cross UniversityWendy Boyd - Southern Cross UniversityAlan Foster - Southern Cross UniversityChristos Markopoulos - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Australian Universities' Review, Vol.60(1), pp.16-24
- Publisher
- National Tertiary Education Union
- Identifiers
- 2875; 991012821872602368
- Academic Unit
- School of Education; School of Environment, Science and Engineering; Faculty of Science and Engineering; Faculty of Education
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article