The Australian Medical Association has recently adopted a policy position concerning advance care planning, which is generally supportive of extending patient self-determination beyond the loss of decision-making capacity. It calls for uniform national legislation for legally enforceable advance health directives (AHD), and statutory protection for practitioners who comply with valid AHD, or who do not comply on several grounds. Analysis of the grounds for non-compliance indicate that they undermine patient autonomy, and aspects of the policy are inconsistent with current common law and statutory regimes that allow an adult to complete a legally binding AHD. The policy therefore threatens the patient self-determination, which it endorses, and places doctors who participate in advance care planning at legal risk.
Journal article
One step forward, two steps back: advance care planning, Australian regulatory frameworks and the Australian Medical Association
Internal Medicine Journal, Vol.37(9), pp.637-643
2007
Metrics
17 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- One step forward, two steps back: advance care planning, Australian regulatory frameworks and the Australian Medical Association
- Creators
- Malcolm H Parker - University of QueenslandC Stewart - Macquarie UniversityL Willmott - Queensland University of TechnologyColleen M Cartwright - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Internal Medicine Journal, Vol.37(9), pp.637-643
- Identifiers
- 1007; 991012820507402368
- Academic Unit
- Aged Services Learning and Research Centre; School of Health and Human Sciences; Office of the Vice Chancellor; Office of Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor, Research
- Resource Type
- Journal article