Logo image
Back
More than biomechanics: how New Zealand manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths conceptualise and manage upper back pain—a qualitative study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

More than biomechanics: how New Zealand manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths conceptualise and manage upper back pain—a qualitative study

Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Prashant Mishra, Tep Mills, Gary Fryer, Rebecca M Mowat, Oliver P Thomson, Jerry Draper-Rodi and Brett Vaughan
BMJ open, Vol.16(6), pp.1-12
29/06/2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113886
PMID: 42373186
pdf
More than biomechanics526.21 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC V4.0
url
More than biomechanicsView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC V4.0

Related links

Metrics

1 Record Views

Abstract

PAIN MANAGEMENT Back pain Spine
Objective: To explore how physiotherapists and osteopaths who use manual therapy in New Zealand conceptualise, reason about and manage upper back pain (UBP), a clinically relevant but inconsistently defined musculoskeletal presentation. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with best-practice qualitative guidance, including Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies. Setting: Private and public musculoskeletal practice settings across New Zealand. Participants: 17 physiotherapists and osteopaths with a minimum of 2 years’ clinical experience, recruited through national professional networks. Results: Data analysis resulted in the generation of four themes: (1) a fuzzy construct; (2) more than biomechanics; (3) hands-on leads to facilitate active care and (4) towards patient-centred care. The analysis revealed an interconnected progression across the key themes, which reflects not only the evolution of clinical practice but also the integration of contemporary evidence, highlighting a shift from intervention-focused to relationship-focused and collaborative care. Conclusion: Clinicians conceptualise UBP as a complex and multifaceted condition, increasingly managed through biopsychosocial reasoning, self-management strategies and patient-centred care. However, definitional ambiguity between UBP and thoracic spine pain, combined with profession-specific patterns, demonstrates the need for clearer terminology and greater interprofessional alignment. Further research incorporating patient perspectives is required to inform guideline development and promote coherent, evidence-informed care for UBP.

Details

Logo image