Logo image
Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks

Yohanna Villalobos, Josep G. Canadell, Elizabeth D. Keller, Peter R. Briggs, Phillip Ford, Ian N. Harman, Timothy W. Hilton, Allison Hogikyan, Ronny Lauerwald, Damien T. Maher, …
Global biogeochemical cycles, Vol.39(10), pp.1-33
10/2025
pdf
Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia3.81 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for AustralasiaView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#6 Clean Water and Sanitation
#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water

Source: InCites

Abstract

Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology Geology Geosciences, Multidisciplinary Life Sciences & Biomedicine Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences Physical Sciences Science & Technology
We present the CH <sub>4</sub> and N </sub>2</sub> O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom‐up and top‐down methods, in line with the RECCAP‐2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom‐up CH <sub>4</sub> budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH <sub>4</sub> yr <sup>−1</sup> , with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH 4 emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom‐up N </sub>2</sub> O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N </sub>2</sub> O yr <sup>−1</sup> , with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top‐down CH <sub>4</sub> (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH 4 yr <sup>−1</sup> ) and N </sub>2</sub> O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N </sub>2</sub> O yr <sup>−1</sup> ) differ in magnitude from the bottom‐up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N </sub>2</sub> O, where the bottom‐up estimate is 71% higher than the top‐down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom‐up natural wetland CH <sub>4</sub>emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH <sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N </sub>2</sub> O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical‐climate feedback.

Details

Logo image