Logo image
Measuring the quality of species list governance
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Measuring the quality of species list governance

Stephen T Garnett, Olaf Banki, Saroj Kanta Barik, Alex J. Berryman, Patrice Bouchard, John S Buckeridge, Leslie Christidis, María Marta Cigliano, Stijn Conix, Haylee Crawford-Weaver, …
BioScience, Vol.First online
28/01/2026
url
Measuring the quality of species list governanceView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open

Related links

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Abstract

taxonomy metrics Catalogue of Life indicators enumeration
Taxonomic lists are important tools for efficient communication about biodiversity. The processes by which they are created and maintained need to be robust, scientifically sound, and transparent. Articulating and scoring a set of governance quality indicators provides a way to assess the relative strengths of list management, gives list users a means to assess the quality of this process, augments the information available to list aggregators, and allows patterns to be measured over time and among forms of life. Based on published principles, we created 12 governance quality indicators which we tested on 16 lists spanning a range of taxonomic groups. Independence of taxonomy from nomenclature scored most strongly, but scores for local and regional involvement were lower. The governance quality indicators may eventually provide a rubric for assessing best practice species list governance but now need a period of further testing, review, and refinement before they are institutionalized.

Details

Logo image