Logo image
Measuring the impact of The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre to enhance nursing and midwifery student clinical placements: a multimodal evaluation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Measuring the impact of The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre to enhance nursing and midwifery student clinical placements: a multimodal evaluation

Colleen Ryan, Robyn Cant, Areum Hyun, Debbie Procter, Louise Alexander, Dianne Bloxome, Lynda Hughes, Fiona Bogossian and Simon Cooper
Nurse education in practice, Vol.87, pp.1-9
08/2025
PMID: 40829346
pdf
Measuring the impact of The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre1.19 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
Measuring the impact of The Australian National Placement Evaluation CentreView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

51 File views/ downloads
9 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

Clinical education Evaluation Impact Midwifery Nursing Placement Quality improvement Students
Aim: To evaluate the early impact of the Centre. Background: The educational quality of nursing and midwifery student clinical placement learning varies. The National Placement Evaluation Centre has a pivotal role in quality improvement by systematically collecting student and supervisor feedback on placement experiences. Design: Multimodal impact evaluation. Methods: Data were collected from website analytics and a survey shared via stakeholder registration emails and social media. The Impact Management Planning and Evaluation Ladder model was used to understand impact. Data were analysed using a sequential, hybrid inductive/deductive approach. Descriptive statistics summarised participant characteristics and qualitative data were themed. Results: Website analytics revealed Centre visitors were from 92 countries, with most reviewing placement evaluation tools. Registered NPEC members represented 37 Australian education and 590 placement providers and together they accessed their data 6,213 times. There was n=107 survey responses. Thematic analysis revealed four themes describing user experiences, enhancements to placements and recommendations for system improvements: 1) A valued system, 2) Barriers to engagement, 3) Resulting changes and 4) It’s early days! The deductive analysis revealed far reaching national impact. Conclusions: The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre impact is amplified by its nationally consistent reach. Data collection via validated placement evaluation tools and streamlined data reporting informs improvements to the quality of nursing and midwifery clinical placements. Increased promotion of the NPEC to students is needed. The Centre has the potential to enhance clinical placement quality across national and international healthcare professions. Promotion to students is necessary. Future directions are reported.

Details

Logo image