Logo image
Back
“It’s not handcuffing the athlete to success or failure”: Sport psychology practitioners’ use of nonspecific goals in applied contexts
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

“It’s not handcuffing the athlete to success or failure”: Sport psychology practitioners’ use of nonspecific goals in applied contexts

Ollie Williamson, Christian Swann, Patricia C. Jackman, Kyle J. M. Bennett and Matthew D. Bird
Journal of applied sport psychology, Vol.37(6), pp.662-683
2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2025.2457986
Appears in  Recent Faculty of Health Publications
pdf
“It’s not handcuffing the athlete to success or failure”1.11 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open Access
url
“It’s not handcuffing the athlete to success or failure”View
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

31 Record Views
1 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Abstract

Sport psychology practitioners (SPPs) are often educated/encouraged to set specific goals when working with athletes. Nevertheless, researchers have indicated that athletes use nonspecific goals in applied settings and that nonspecific goals can enhance performance and various positive psychological outcomes. However, researchers have yet to explore SPPs’ experiences with, and perceptions of, using nonspecific goals when working with athletes. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted semi-structured inter-views with 12 SPPs who had provided sport psychology support to athletes for an average of 13.42 years (SD ¼ 11.30). Findings from our content analysis showed that the SPPs perceived open goals (e.g.,“to see what you can do”) and range goals (e.g., “to run between40-60 minutes”) to be more beneficial than do-your-best and as-well-as-possible goals. Despite differences in perceptions across various types of nonspecific goals, the SPPs reported that all non specific goals were used in several situations (e.g., situations of adversity) for multiple reasons (e.g., performance/situation uncertainty). The SPPs perceived that all nonspecific goals could reduce maladaptive psychological responses, increase positive psychological responses, facilitate personal growth, and enable greater flexibility/freedom. However, SPPs perceived that all nonspecific goals could lack clarity and imply a lack of confidence in athletes. Our findings capture key differences across various types of nonspecific goals while highlighting the situations/reasons that SPPs used nonspecific goals to facilitate positive athlete outcomes. Given the perceived benefits of nonspecific goals, we suggest that different types of nonspecific goals could be considered as additional/alternate goal-setting interventions in sport.

Details

Logo image