Logo image
Back
Is 'hope' helpful or a hinderance? Implications for coastal governance
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Is 'hope' helpful or a hinderance? Implications for coastal governance

Carmen E. Elrick-Barr, Timothy F. Smith and Dana C. Thomsen
Ocean & coastal management, Vol.248, pp.1-5
01/02/2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106953
pdf
Is ‘hope’ helpful or a hinderance?1.16 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0
url
Is ‘hope’ helpful or a hinderance?View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

Metrics

1 Record Views
6 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: SDGs from InCites

Abstract

climate change adaptation coastal governance hope transformation integrated coastal zone management
Projected population growth and climate change paint an increasingly bleak picture for many coastal communities and their already threatened ecosystems. Yet, coastal managers and residents provide expressions of hope. In this short communication we reflect on the findings of a four-year research project examining coastal governance in rapidly growing Australian coastal communities. Practitioners shared their perspectives on current coastal governance approaches and were hopeful that sought-after goals would be achieved. However, hopefulness contrasts with self-reported barriers to change and limited evidence of transformative action. Thus, we ask whether hopefulness is misplaced, and a barrier to change, or whether hope remains a necessary precursor to transformative action. We find it is both: hope can provide a vision for a resilient future and a beacon towards the challenge of creating novel, exciting, and equitable futures. Yet, hope is insufficient unless accompanied by actions for resilient social and ecological communities. Hope without action is baseless and exacerbates vulnerability by limiting proactive responses, squandering valuable time, and further weakening systems. The findings have relevance in responding to global environmental challenges by distinguishing between 'hope that helps' versus 'hope that hinders' in the governance of complex systems.

Details

Logo image