Journal article
How well do patients understand written instructions?: health literacy assessment in rural and urban rheumatology outpatients
Medicine, Vol.93(25)
2014
Metrics
17 File views/ downloads
45 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
<p><p id="x-x-x-x-x-x-x-P18">The aim of this study was to assess health literacy (word recognition and comprehension) in patients at a rural rheumatology practice and to compare this to health literacy levels in patients from an urban rheumatology practice. Inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study were as follows: ≥18-year-old patients at a rural rheumatology practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and an urban Sydney rheumatology practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice, Kogarah, Australia). Exclusion criteria were as follows: ill-health precluding participation; poor vision/hearing, non-English primary language. Word recognition was assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). Comprehension was assessed using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Practical comprehension and numeracy were assessed by asking patients to follow prescribing instructions for 5 common rheumatology medications. At the rural practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic), 124/160 patients agreed to participate (F:M 83:41, mean age 60.3 ± 12.2) whereas the corresponding number at the urban practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice) was 99/119 (F:M 69:30, mean age 60.7 ± 17.5). Urban patients were more likely to be born overseas, speak another language at home, and be employed. There was no difference in REALM or TOFHLA scores between the 2 sites, and so data were pooled. REALM scores indicated 15% (33/223) of patients had a reading level ≤Grade 8 whereas 8% (18/223) had marginal or inadequate functional health literacy as assessed by the TOFHLA. Dosing instructions for ibuprofen and methotrexate were incorrectly understood by 32% (72/223) and 21% (46/223) of patients, respectively. Up to 15% of rural and urban patients had low health literacy and <1/3 of patients incorrectly followed dosing instructions for common rheumatology drugs. There was no significant difference in word recognition, functional health literacy, and numeracy between rural and urban rheumatology patients.</p>
Details
- Title
- How well do patients understand written instructions?: health literacy assessment in rural and urban rheumatology outpatients
- Creators
- Peter K Wong - University of New South WalesLaura Christie - University of New South WalesJenny L Johnston Dr - Southern Cross UniversityAlison C Bowling - Southern Cross UniversityDiane Freeman - University of New South WalesFred JoshuaPaul BirdKaren Chia - University of New South WalesHanish Bagga - University of New South Wales
- Publication Details
- Medicine, Vol.93(25)
- Identifiers
- 2161; 991012822007002368
- Academic Unit
- Faculty of Education; School of Education
- Resource Type
- Journal article