Logo image
“Hoping for life means waiting for death”: Emotional anchoring and themata in media reporting on paediatric organ donation
Journal article   Peer reviewed

“Hoping for life means waiting for death”: Emotional anchoring and themata in media reporting on paediatric organ donation

Maddison Norton, Gail Moloney, Michael Sutherland, Sally Sargeant and Alison Bowling
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Vol.31(5), pp.537-556
19/05/2021
url
“Hoping for life means waiting for death”: Emotional anchoring and themata in media reporting on paediatric organ donationView
Published (Version of record)

Related links

Metrics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

Emotional anchoring media analysis paediatric organ donation social representations themata Social and Community Psychology Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Health not elsewhere classified
Paediatric organ donation rates in Australia do not match the demand for paediatric organ transplants. Paediatric donations require parents to consent to donate the organs of their child, yet little research exists on how paediatric donation is understood outside of the medical world. Drawing from social representation theory, we examined how paediatric donation was portrayed by the media, the primary source of information about organ donation. Fifty-nine newspaper articles, across eight Australian newspapers, were subjected to thematic analysis. Common themes coalesced around the paediatric donation decision, what the decision means for parents, and the experiences of paediatric transplant recipients and their families. Donation and transplantation were portrayed either as a contradiction, where a child was required to die in order for a child to live, or as mutually beneficial, where donation was a positive outcome of a tragic death. Interpreted within a dialogical framework, we suggest that notions of contradiction and mutual benefit are generated by the underlying thema life/death, and shaped in tandem by the paediatric context. The roles of themata, emotional anchoring, and objectification are discussed. Importantly, this study highlights the need to investigate the interplay between emotional contradiction, mutual dependence, and parental decision-making about paediatric organ donation.

Details

Logo image