Logo image
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique

Laura Ryan, Rachel Wenke, Joan Carlini, Kelly Weir, Margaret Shapiro, Noela Baglot, Georgia Tobiano, Sally Sargeant and Laetitia Hattingh
Research involvement and engagement, Vol.10, 72
11/07/2024
pdf
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique1.18 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group techniqueView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

47 Record Views

Abstract

Consumer and community engagement Hospitals Health research Patient and public involvement Patient participation Implementation science and evaluation Health equity Health system performance (incl. effectiveness of programs)
Background Consumer involvement in health research is when patients, their families and caregivers work with researchers on research projects. Despite the growing expectation for health services to facilitate the involvement of consumers in research, the practical integration of this approach is an ongoing process, with limited research conducted into how Australian health services can support this practice. This study explored consumer perspectives on the barriers and solutions to enabling consumer involvement in research within an Australian tertiary hospital and health service, and staff perspectives on the solutions to facilitating consumer involvement. A prior survey had identified barriers to consumer involvement from the staff perspective. The broad aim was to inform the development of a framework to help promote consumer involvement in research within the health service. Methods A Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was utilised with groups comprised of health service consumers and staff. Three health consumers were co-researchers in the full life-cycle of this study and are included as authors. Results Ten consumers and 14 staff participated across three sessions ranging from one to three hours. For consumers, barriers to their involvement were grouped into seven domains: (1) lack of connection with researchers/research projects, (2) low research literacy, (3) structural barriers, (4) lack of acknowledgement, (5) implementation challenges, (6) inadequate information provision, and (7) representation concerns. Solutions to enabling involvement were grouped into five domains: (1) support to connect with researchers/research projects, (2) adequate information provision, (3) incentive for involvement, (4) acknowledgement, and (5) balanced representation. Staff ideas for solutions were grouped into five domains: (1) support to connect with consumers, (2) support to involve consumers, (3) access to funds to remunerate consumers, (4) more time to involve consumers, and (5) staff training. Conclusion Through an NGT methodology, this study delivered a nuanced comprehension of perspectives on involving consumers in research from both health service consumers and staff. These findings serve as a foundation for identifying strategies that foster enhanced and refined relationships between consumers and researchers, advancing the collaborative landscape in health research. The findings from this project offer valuable strategies for researchers to better engage consumers in research and for consumer groups to enhance their involvement. Additionally, these insights could be used by other health services to advocate for essential resources.

Details

Logo image