The aims of event assessment are often unclear. Failure to clarify objectives has resulted in a less than satisfactory approach to event evaluation given that the two major approaches, economic impact analysis (EIA) and cost–benefit analysis (CBA), can give conflicting results. Since economic impacts do not equate to net benefits, an important topic for future research should be the issue of reconciling EIA and CBA. An approach is recommended that bridges the gap between EIA and CBA, in a way that has policy relevance for destination managers. Bridging this gap calls forth a host of challenges that must be met by researchers in the future.
Journal article
Economic evaluation of special events: redconciling economic impact and cost-benefit analysis
Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol.16(2), pp.115-129
2016
Metrics
50 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- Economic evaluation of special events: redconciling economic impact and cost-benefit analysis
- Creators
- L Dwyer - University of LjubljanaL Jago - University of SurreyPeter Forsyth - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol.16(2), pp.115-129
- Identifiers
- 1824; 991012821005702368
- Academic Unit
- School of Business and Tourism; Faculty of Business, Law and Arts
- Resource Type
- Journal article