Logo image
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test

Alexia Rohde, Suhail A Doi, Linda Worrall, Erin Godecke, Anna Farrell, Robyn O'Halloran, Molly McCracken, Nadine Lawson, Rebecca Cremer and Andrew Wong
Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol.44(4), pp.625-636
22/06/2020
PMID: 32571105
pdf
Rohde and others_2020_Development and diagnostic validation of the BEBLT_Journal article2.09 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1773547View
Published (Version of record)

Related links

Metrics

29 File views/ downloads
52 Record Views

Abstract

Aphasia diagnosis test stroke evidence-based sensitivity and specificity Other Medical and Health Sciences Public Health and Health Services Allied Health Therapies (excl. Mental Health Services)
<em>Purpose:</em> To describe the development and determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test in detecting aphasia.</p> <em>Methods:</em> Consecutive acute stroke admissions (n = 100; mean = 66.49y) participated in a single (assessor) blinded cross-sectional study. Index assessment was the ∼45 min Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test. The Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test is further divided into four 15-25 min Short Tests: two Foundation Tests (severe impairment), Standard (moderate) and High Level Test (mild). Independent reference standard included the Language Screening Test, Aphasia Screening Test, Comprehensive Aphasia Test and/or Measure for Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities, treating team diagnosis and aphasia referral post-ward discharge.</p> <em>Results:</em> Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test cut-off score of ≤157 demonstrated 80.8% (LR+ =10.9) sensitivity and 92.6% (LR− =0.21) specificity. All Short Tests reported specificities of ≥92.6%. Foundation Tests I (cut-off ≤61) and II (cut-off ≤51) reported lower sensitivity (≥57.5%) given their focus on severe conditions. The Standard (cut-off ≤90) and High Level Test (cut-off ≤78) reported sensitivities of ≥72.6%.</p> <em>Conclusion:</em> The Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test is a sensitive assessment of aphasia. Diagnostically, the High Level Test recorded the highest psychometric capabilities of the Short Tests, equivalent to the full Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test. The test is available for download from <i>brisbanetest.org</i>

Details

Logo image