This study tests whether the adoption of Australian best practice corporate governance recommendations is associated with financial performance measured by return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. Results suggest that recommended corporate governance structures relating to the adoption of board sub-committees are sound policy recommendations that enhance performance using the accounting measure ROA and the market-based measure Tobin’s Q. In contrast, the emphasis on board independence guidelines, specifically having outside independent directors, has a negative impact on ROA and Tobin’sQ.However,thereareconflictingsignificant results between the accounting and market measures for having a dual CEO/chairperson and board size.
Journal article
Corporate governance and company performance in Australia
Australian Accounting Review, Vol.20(4), pp.372-396
2010
Metrics
55 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- Corporate governance and company performance in Australia
- Creators
- Jacqueline Christensen - Bond UniversityPamela Kent - Bond UniversityJenny Stewart - Griffith University
- Publication Details
- Australian Accounting Review, Vol.20(4), pp.372-396
- Identifiers
- 1838; 991012820667602368
- Academic Unit
- School of Business and Tourism; Faculty of Business, Law and Arts
- Resource Type
- Journal article