The traditional methodologies including spatial decision support systems have at times showed their ineffectiveness in terms of gathering, analyzing and incorporating diversified views of affected persons into resettlement planning. This ineffectiveness is in dealing with unstructured problems and uncertainty in analyzing alternative strategies. This paper therefore proposes an integrated methodology (combination of argumentative mapping and qualitative probabilistic networks) to counter these limitations. The new methodology was introduced in a large-scale infrastructure project to verify its applicability. Results derived from the study not only provide better insights into resettlement-related problems, but also indicate critical management options for desired objectives.
Journal article
Bridging the gaps between impact assessments and resettlement planning: a case study of Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project, Bangladesh
Planning Practice & Research, Vol.31(1), pp.41-64
2016
Metrics
28 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- Bridging the gaps between impact assessments and resettlement planning: a case study of Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project, Bangladesh
- Creators
- Muhammad N MahmoodRobyn L Keast - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Planning Practice & Research, Vol.31(1), pp.41-64
- Identifiers
- 1554; 991012820706902368
- Academic Unit
- School of Business and Tourism; Faculty of Business, Law and Arts; Management
- Resource Type
- Journal article