Logo image
Back
Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young People who have Experienced Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Reviews
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young People who have Experienced Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Reviews

Lynne McPherson, Kathomi Gatwiri, Meaghan Vosz, Noel MacNamara, Janise Mitchell and Joe Tucci
Journal of child & adolescent trauma, Vol.18, pp.279-291
06/2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-025-00702-4
pdf
Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young People1.12 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young PeopleView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
24 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

child sexual abuse review of reviews practice intervention assessment
This paper focuses on understandings of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) and best practice approaches in practice contexts to assessment and intervention with children who have experienced abuse. By collating data from existing reviews of literature or scoping reviews to formulate one overarching systematic scoping review, we provide a knowledge synthesis of practices in assessment and interventions into CSA. Utilising a two-phase scoping review method, the screening process resulted in twenty-two reviews for inclusion in this review. As a result of the analysis process, findings were identified across three broad themes: i) the limitations of current knowledge and official data about CSA and low rates of CSA prosecutions; ii) best practice in assessment and intervention; and iii) critical gaps in knowledge on CSA from diverse communities and those experiencing intersectional disadvantage. We conclude that whilst knowledge on CSA is continually emerging, there is limited consensus and significant challenges in the disclosure processes; poor skills in sensitive assessment and limited evidence about systemic responses, including low prosecution rates and poor integration of knowledge into practice; and promising interventions. There is also a critical gap in knowledge about CSA within racially and culturally minoritised groups, and other communities that report intersectional marginalisation.

Details

Logo image