Logo image
Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review

Yasamin Veziari, Saravana Kumar and Matthew Leach
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, Vol.21(1), pp.1-12
01/07/2021
PMID: 34266441
pdf
Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping review1.12 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
Addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a scoping reviewView
Published (Version of record)CC BY V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

Abstract

Complementary therapies Scoping review Evidence-based medicine Knowledge translation Evidence-based practice Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Abstract Background: Over the past few decades, the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown considerably and along with it, scrutiny regarding its evidence base. While this is to be expected, and is in line with other health disciplines, research in CAM is confronted by numerous obstacles. This scoping review aims to identify and report the strategies implemented to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. Methods: The scoping review was undertaken using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, JBI and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened the records, following which data extraction was completed for the included studies. Descriptive synthesis was used to summarise the data. Results: Of the 7945 records identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the oBSTACLES instrument as a framework, the included studies reported diverse strategies to address barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM. All included studies reported the use of educational strategies and collaborative initiatives with CAM stakeholders, including targeted funding, to address a range of barriers. Conclusions: While the importance of addressing barriers to the conduct and application of research in CAM has been recognised, to date, much of the focus has been limited to initiatives originating from a handful of jurisdictions, for a small group of CAM disciplines, and addressing few barriers. Myriad barriers continue to persist, which will require concerted effort and collaboration across a range of CAM stakeholders and across multiple sectors. Further research can contribute to the evidence base on how best to address these barriers to promote the conduct and application of research in CAM.

Details

Logo image