In this article, the authors consider the impact of postmodernist reinterpretations of ‘wilderness’ in the context of wilderness management, looking at the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area as a case study. They analyse the 2015 Draft Management Plan for the area from a wild law perspective. The proposed mixed uses and abandonment of the wilderness zoning in the Draft Plan detract from effective wilderness preservation and reflect both anthropocentric and eco-pragmatic considerations. Regulatory regimes such as that put forward in the Draft Plan jeopardise wilderness environments and will replace them with, to borrow a phrase from Emma Maris, ‘rambunctious gardens’ patrolled by legions of tourists anxious to obtain a wilderness experience.
Journal article
A wild law perspective on wilderness management: managing the Tasmanian wilderness world heritage area
Australian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, Vol.18(2), pp.145-165
2015
Metrics
42 Record Views
Abstract
Details
- Title
- A wild law perspective on wilderness management: managing the Tasmanian wilderness world heritage area
- Creators
- Nicole Rogers - Southern Cross UniversityBrendan Mackey - Australian National University
- Publication Details
- Australian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, Vol.18(2), pp.145-165
- Identifiers
- 1417; 991012821122102368
- Academic Unit
- Faculty of Business, Law and Arts; School of Law and Justice
- Resource Type
- Journal article