Logo image
Back
A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workers
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workers

Nathan J Wilson, Amy Pracilio, Julia Morphet, Michelle Kersten, Thomas Buckley, Julian N Trollor and Andrew Cashin
Journal of clinical nursing, Vol.32(17-18), pp.6000-6011
09/2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16724
PMID: 37149737
pdf
A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workers949.61 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open Access
url
A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workersView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0,  Open

Related links

Metrics

496 File views/ downloads
175 Record Views
13 Times Cited - Web of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Abstract

delegation disability models of practice nurses support worker unlicenced worker
Aim To scope the international literature about registered nurses delegated models of care to unlicenced workers, identify gaps and reflect upon how the evidence relates to nursing in multiple contexts. Design Scoping review of the peer reviewed literature from the year 2000 onwards, using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Methods The study searched the following databases in February 2022: CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, and included keywords, Boolean operators and subject headings relevant to registered nurses delegating the provision of care to unlicenced workers. Results A total of 49 articles met the eligibility criteria for this study, and relevant data were extractedThree models of delegation were highlighted within the literature: direct, indirect and a mixture of both. The data highlighted that direct delegation mainly occurred in acute contexts, with delegation decreasing with increasing patient acuity and/or complexity but the threshold of when this would occur was not clear. There was one intervention study that measured patient outcomes which could aid in the determination of what is effective delegation. For studies that did report on it (n = 6), there were few examples of better patient outcomes in cases where care was delegated from registered nurses to unlicenced workers. Conclusions The scoping review highlighted heterogeneity in practice areas and methods of delegation practice. A key gap in literature is the absence of studies focusing on patient outcomes, with a clear baseline to measure and identify effective delegation practices. Additionally, the legal and logistical implications presented in both direct and indirect delegation practices is not evident in the literature. Implications for the Profession Decisions related to delegation are often made at the service level and prescribed to those who work within the service, suggesting that models of indirect delegation are in fact not delegation at all, rather a re-distribution of nurses' work. Relevance to clinical practice Delegation is a vital component of the scope of practice of registered nurses. This review has highlighted unique differences in delegation by practice context, where the proliferation of unlicensed workers in certain contexts places a vastly different professional and legal burden on the registered nurse.

Details

Logo image