Logo image
A scoping literature review of generative artificial intelligence for supporting neurodivergent school students
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A scoping literature review of generative artificial intelligence for supporting neurodivergent school students

Michelle Ronksley-Pavia, Lan Nguyen, Elizabeth Wheeley, Judy Rose, Michelle M. Neumann, Chris Bigum and David L. Neumann
Computers and education. Artificial intelligence, Vol.9, pp.1-16
12/2025
Appears in  Recent Faculty of Education Publications
pdf
A scoping literature review of generative artificial intelligence1.88 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0
url
A scoping literature review of generative artificial intelligenceView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

Abstract

Artificial intelligence GenAI Generative AI Neurodiversity Personalized learning School Teachers
While Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platforms like ChatGPT have gained significant traction in education, their specific applications for neurodivergent learners remain largely unmapped. Through systematic searching of academic databases and grey literature between 2020 and 2024, this scoping literature review examined the emerging landscape of GenAI applications in supporting neurodivergent students (e.g., those with ADHD, autism, dyslexia, gifted, twice-exceptional) within K-12 educational contexts. Twenty-one relevant sources were identified, discussing GenAI usage with neurodivergent students, the analysis revealed discussion of several predominant applications, including personalized learning, administrative assistance for educators, and development of individualized education plans. The review identified both promising approaches and significant concerns. Benefits included GenAI's potential to provide real-time, personalized support for students as well as reducing administrative burdens for educators. However, notable concerns emerged regarding information accuracy, over-reliance on AI, privacy considerations, and the need for human oversight. The limited empirical evidence base was particularly striking, with only nine studies providing original research data. The review identified critical gaps in current understanding, particularly regarding GenAI's effectiveness across different neurodivergent conditions and curriculum areas, and little evidence of approaches detailed in ways that educators could use. This scoping review demonstrates the need for robust empirical research examining GenAI usage in learning for neurodivergent students. These insights are timely and crucial for educators, researchers, and policymakers working to harness GenAI's potential in supporting neurodivergent learners within inclusive educational environments.

Details

Logo image