The effect that marketing has had on the prescription decisions of the medical profession is an area of great social and governmental concern and has been the subject of substantial international debate. In this study, the importance of brand name as a factor influencing the prescription habits of general practitioners and psychiatrists is examined. Data on antidepressant prescriptions supplied by the Australian Governments Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme and results derived from MANOVA and ANOVA analyses suggest that the brand name as much as chemical differences influenced the prescription of choice of antidepressants by both general practitioners and psychiatrists. The use of a well-promoted brand name may be an important evaluation shortcut by both groups regardless of detailed training resulting in medical practices, which may undermine the social imperative of affordable medical care for all. The authors suggest that clinical appropriateness of prescriptions for antidepressants by brand name needs further investigation.
Journal article
A rose by any other name? the influence of brand name versus chemical differences in the prescription of antidepressants
Journal of Macromarketing, Vol.28(3), pp.258-274
2008
Metrics
199 File views/ downloads
35 Record Views
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites
Abstract
Details
- Title
- A rose by any other name? the influence of brand name versus chemical differences in the prescription of antidepressants
- Creators
- Steven P Ward - Murdoch UniversityAnthony Pecotich - University of SplitAron O'Cass - University of NewcastleCraig C Julian - Southern Cross University
- Publication Details
- Journal of Macromarketing, Vol.28(3), pp.258-274
- Identifiers
- 1314; 991012821007902368
- Academic Unit
- School of Business and Tourism; Faculty of Business, Law and Arts
- Resource Type
- Journal article