Logo image
A reflective practice learning experience with higher education exercise physiology students
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A reflective practice learning experience with higher education exercise physiology students

Rosanne Coutts, Pauletta M Irwin and Luke Del Vecchio
Reflective practice, Vol.25(2), pp.251-266
2024
pdf
A reflective practice learning experience with higher education exercise physiology students674.91 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open Access
url
A reflective practice learning experience with higher education exercise physiology studentsView
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Related links

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
36 Record Views

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Abstract

Reflective practice clinical practice exercise physiology lifelong learning reflection Curriculum and pedagogy theory and development Allied health and rehabilitation science not elsewhere classified Teaching and curriculum not elsewhere classified Clinical health not elsewhere classified
Accredited exercise physiologists are higher education qualified health professionals who prescribe exercise as a preventative and treatment modality for individuals diagnosed with chronic conditions. Reflective practice is integral to the exercise physiology discipline, however its integration into curriculum requires further development and research. Utilising clinically based scenarios, final year students (N = 21), participated in a three-week reflective learning experience using the 6 step SPROUT acronym, represented as Situation, Past experiences, Read and refer, Other influences, Understanding and Taking it forward. Students completed the Reflection in Learning Scale (RLS) and responded to questions about confidence. Reflective scripts were reviewed, and clinical supervisors were interviewed. For the RLS, students scored higher on planning, knowledge integration and mental processing and lower for topic interactions, mindful summarising and coping with negative feelings. Students (75%) indicated that they were mostly or very confident in the use of reflective practice. Qualitative responses showed that using SPROUT did reinforce clinical learning. Time constraints and the separateness of higher education from the ‘real world’ were also points of view. Analysis of student scripts revealed a range of developing reflective ability. Supervisors focused on the importance of reflective practice and the contribution, that SPROUT had made to the overall experience.

Details

Logo image