Logo image
Back
“A Lie Cannot Live”: How Research Misconduct Allegations Could Become Weaponised in Academia
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

“A Lie Cannot Live”: How Research Misconduct Allegations Could Become Weaponised in Academia

Brendan Walker-Munro and Mohiuddin Ahmed
Minerva, Vol.First online
19/08/2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-026-09660-z
url
“A Lie Cannot Live”View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Related links

Metrics

1 Record Views

Abstract

Fabrication Generative artificial intelligence Research misconduct Research security SLAPP
In this article, we discuss the emerging prominence of ‘strategic lawsuits against public participation’ (SLAPPs) across Europe and the United Kingdom as mechanisms for chilling academic discourse, particularly around topics considered unpalatable to foreign governments. We argue that the increased prominence of SLAPPs foreshadows a new form of abuse of legal process against universities that attempt to protect their researchers: vexatious or malicious complaints of research misconduct against academics and universities, using what we term here as ‘strategic complaints against researchers’ (SCAR). Identifying the possibility of SCARs as an emergent form of procedural abuse will assist universities in formulating policies and practices that separate legitimate grievances from acts of foreign interference. Together with government, funding agencies and industry partners, the higher education sector should take the lead in focusing research misconduct standards on identifying, triaging, and (where necessary) eliminating abuses of the research misconduct system aimed at chilling academic inquiry. Where this will end? In the Abyss, one may prophecy; whither all Delusions are, at all moments, travelling; where this Delusion has now arrived. For if there be a Faith, from of old, it is this, as we often repeat, that no Lie can live for ever.--Thomas Carlyle (1837)

Details

Logo image