scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL/SoLT) evidence-based evidence-informed quality research impact of evidence
The differences between regularly published practice papers and evidence-based Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) manuscripts as preferred publications are outlined and discussed in this editorial. By examining the literature and backstory of SoTL, clear guidelines for well-designed research studies supported by evidence provide compelling reasons for SoTL papers to contribute to international knowledge, change thinking, advance practice in higher education and meet the aims of scholarly academic journal. The types of evidence that can be used are described, and a practical checklist for authors to benchmark their manuscript against SoTL principles is also offered as a hands-on tool for improving manuscript submissions. Studies based on evidence and scholarship establish credible, valid, and current knowledge through defensible theoretical frameworks and systematic methodology. Scholarly studies not only contribute to knowledge, improve practice, advance pedagogy, and inform policy but also drive significant change in international higher education contexts
Details
Title
Editorial: The difference in practice papers and scholarship: We publish the latter
Creators
Sally Ashton-Hay - Southern Cross University
Bianca Coleman - University of Tasmania
Miriam Sullivan - Edith Cowan University
Cathy Mae Toquero - Mindanao State University
Publication Details
Journal of university teaching & learning practice, Vol.22(1)
Publisher
Open Access Publishing Assoc
Identifiers
991013260585102368
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr Sally Ashton-Hay, Dr Bianca Coleman, Dr Miriam Sullivan, Cathy Mae Toquero.
Academic Unit
Centre for Teaching and Learning
Language
English
Resource Type
Editorial
Browse and search our outputs
Browse and search our profiles
Browse by organisational units
Contact SCU Library Systems team
For display interface
Details
Editorial: The difference in practice papers and scholarship