Overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy in sports betting behaviour

Alison C Bowling; Leigh D Grant

doi:10.4226/47/5ad57a1d6dbb1

Back

Overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy in sports betting behaviour

Dataset

Open access

Overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy in sports betting behaviour

Alison C Bowling and Leigh D Grant

Southern Cross University

2018

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4226/47/5ad57a1d6dbb1

Files and links (1)

csv

Sports_betting_data_2018040949.71 kBDownload View

CC BY V4.0, Open Access

Metrics

44 File views/ downloads

198 Record Views

Abstract

sports betting

heuristics

online gambling

Respondents were asked whether or not they would bet on the outcomes of eight single pairs of NRL matches. Sports betting behaviour, gambling consumption, overconfidence and other demographics were also obtained.

Data Processing: Stata/IC 14.2

Data was collected by Dedar Abjula, Leigh Grant and Alison Bowling, by means of a Qualtrix survey.

Details

Title: Overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy in sports betting behaviour
Creators: Alison C Bowling (Chief Investigator) - Southern Cross University
Leigh D Grant (Data Collector) - Southern Cross University
Comment: Data was collected by Dedar Abjula, Leigh Grant and Alison Bowling, by means of a Qualtrix survey.
Publisher: Southern Cross University
Identifiers: 1044; 991012822275102368
Academic Unit: School of Health and Human Sciences; Southern Cross University
Language: English
Resource Type: Dataset

Overconfidence and the conjunction fallacy in sports betting behaviour

Files and links (1)

Metrics

Abstract

Details

Southern Cross University Social media