Learning is facilitated by participation and interaction, and can be synchronously or asynchronously in online learning. This current study investigated the relationship between students academic success and online interaction and participation, and explored their class attendance (synchronous virtual classes and/or watching the recorded virtual classes) in the online study mode of the Preparing for Success Program. The data were retrieved from usage information data provided by the Blackboard Learn learning management system. The results show that it is important for students to attend class, but it does not necessarily make a difference whether students attend synchronous virtual classes or watch the recordings of the virtual classes. A significant relationship was found between academic success and the number of hours students participated and interacted in the online learning system. Academic success may be increased by providing various options for students to participate and interact online, and to attend classes synchronously or asynchronously. The flexibility of online education can enable students to be successful in their studies. Through the effective design of the learning environment, flexibility can be increased by providing choice and control.
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657 663. doi:10.111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x
Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
McBrien, J. L., Jones, P. T., & Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2018). Exploring online interaction and online learner participation in an online science subject through the lens of the interaction equivalence theorem. Student Success, 9(2), 1 10. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.424
Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1172 1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009
Perera, L., & Richardson, P. (2010). Students' use of online academic resources within a course web site and its relationship with their course performance: An exploratory study. Accounting Education, 19(6), 587 600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2010.529639
Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69 84. Retrieved from https://www.itejournal.org/
Wong, L. (2013). Student engagement with online resources and its impact on learning outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 129 146. Retrieved from https://www.informingscience.org/Journals/JITEIIP/Overview